For example, Numbono recently posted a screenshot where he won all four MATRIX tourneys and won the Dominatrix Prize (all the MATRIX payouts go to him -instead of paying 1st and 2nd place). So for a $2.25 buy in, he wins $8.64.
See this example for payouts in a MATRIX SNG:
But what if he finishes 1st in 3 out of 4 of the tournaments and 2nd in the last one. His payout is now $7.08 (3x$1.56 for 1st finishes + 1x$0.84 for 2nd finish + $1.56 for 1st in MATRIX pool).
Traditional payouts in a 6max $2.25 tournament are $7.80 for 1st place and $4.20 for 2nd place. See example here:
So Numbono actually increased his profit by nearly 11% since he was able to dominate all four tables in the MATRIX rather than playing a traditional 6max SNG and finishing 1st. But if he has 1 2nd place then he drops his profit by 9% (rather than having won the traditional SNG). And if he is winning 3 out of the 4 tournaments, I would argue that he should easily win 1st place in a regular 6max style against the same opponents.
Or should I conclude that he will win 3 out of 4 traditional SNG's. Therefore, he gets $23.40 in winnings or 260% ROI. But playing 4 MATRIX's and winning 3 out of 4 tables pays $28.32 or 315% ROI.
At first look, my thought was that you have to win all 4 tournaments in a MATRIX in order to profit better than playing in a traditional SNG. But maybe averaged over time, the MATRIX may be better.
Of course, if you hop in a MATRIX where you don't cash at all then you get out cheaper than having played 4 tournaments against those same players.
In any case, people probably play them because they are fun. I will probably end up trying them, even though I still think my ROI will be better playing the traditional games.
Are you playing in them and what do you think?
Stay patient.....
1 comment:
I've played a few, and I'm not profitable. I would recommend not playing on the little screen of my laptop...yikes.
Post a Comment